<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Political Remix Video &#187; vidding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/tag/vidding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com</link>
	<description>Transforming Mass Media and Pop Culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:24:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Stay Awake</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2010/08/23/stay-awake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2010/08/23/stay-awake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>anita</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=1830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Between the ominous acapella version of the classic Mary Poppins song performed by Suzanne Vega and the skin crawling subject matter in this vid, Laura Shapiro has expertly remixed and brought to light a reoccurring problem in women&#8217;s science fiction representations. All to often female characters in science fiction and fantasy television narratives are forcibly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between the ominous acapella version of the classic <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPw6QBSggls">Mary Poppins song</a> performed by Suzanne Vega and the skin crawling subject matter in this vid, Laura Shapiro has expertly remixed and brought to light a reoccurring problem in women&#8217;s science fiction representations. All to often female characters in science fiction and fantasy television narratives are forcibly impregnated with some supernatural being that will bring destruction/salvation to the world. The demonic/alien pregnancy plot device is so pervasive that the remix artist almost had too much source material to work with.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2010/08/23/stay-awake/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Laura uses scenes of women who have been forcibly knocked up, had their ovaries harvested or otherwise reduced to their  basic biological functions, ultimately becoming nothing but baby making machines.  And it&#8217;s not only forced pregnancies that Laura is critiquing but also women carrying natural, wanted fetuses whose wombs are being used as sites of torture.  She used clips from science fiction and fantasy television shows to explore what she sees as reproductive terrorism, &#8220;the way women&#8217;s reproductive capacity is used to colonize them and made to seem unnatural, spooky, disgusting, and horrifying.&#8221; Laura has  created a stunning visual critique that exposes this sexist TV trope that can only be described as &#8220;creepy&#8221;.</p>
<p>To see her original post visit her <a href="http://laurashapiro.dreamwidth.org/306241.html">Dreamwidth</a> blog and watch her other vids at <a href="http://laurasha.com/vids/">laurasha.com</a>.  We have previously featured Laura&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://laurasha.com/vids/">Wouldn&#8217;t it be Nice</a>&#8221; vid.</p>
<p><em>Anita Sarkeesian is a feminist media literacy advocate, pop culture  critic and fair use proponent.  She maintains an ongoing web series of  video commentaries from a fangirl/feminist/anti-oppression perspective  at her website <a href="http://www.feministfrequency.com/" target="_blank">www.FeministFrequency.com.</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2010/08/23/stay-awake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Many Dicks (Video Games)</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2010/03/26/too-many-dicks-video-games/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2010/03/26/too-many-dicks-video-games/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=1534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This remix by Anita Sarkeesian of FeministFrequency.com appropriates the sexist song &#8220;Too Many Dicks on the Dance Floor&#8221; by Flight of the Conchords to critique the male domination, hyper masculinity and glorification of violence in popular video games. The video uses source material from 39 different games and was inspired by Sloane&#8217;s &#8220;Star Trek Dance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This remix by Anita Sarkeesian of <a href="http://www.feministfrequency.com/" target="_blank">FeministFrequency.com</a> appropriates the sexist song &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wl_uQOABxg">Too Many Dicks on the Dance Floor</a>&#8221; by Flight of the Conchords to critique the male domination, hyper masculinity and glorification of violence in popular video games. The video uses source material from 39 different games and was inspired by <a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/06/29/star-trek-dance-floor-too-many-dicks/#comments" target="_blank">Sloane&#8217;s &#8220;Star Trek Dance Floor&#8221;</a> vid which comments on the lack of women in the Star Trek movie re-boot released last year. (Incidentally, Sloane&#8217;s vid also holds the distinction of being the most viewed post on our blog.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2010/03/26/too-many-dicks-video-games/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Once paired with the misogynist lyrics, the games&#8217; imagery of guns, swords and chainsaws become phallic representations of patriarchal power in a virtual world where few women exist. Especially lacking are female characters who are not hypersexualized and/or simply replicating the intense violence of male game heroes. Anita&#8217;s remix uses the lyrics to highlight two games in particular (both with women of color protagonists) that help counter the genre&#8217;s male dominance: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal_%28video_game%29">Portal</a>, a first person action puzzle game which utilizes <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_video_game#Non-violent_first_person_shooters">non-violent problem solving</a> strategies, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror%27s_Edge">Mirror&#8217;s Edge,</a> a less-violent adventure game involving the navigation of a dystopian city maze. You can also see a list of all the games used in this remix on <a href="http://www.feministfrequency.com/2010/03/remix-too-many-dicks/">FeministFrequency.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2010/03/26/too-many-dicks-video-games/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Are Creators Too</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/10/05/we-are-creators-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/10/05/we-are-creators-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About Remixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REMOVED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=1128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Public Knowledge has just released their new series of four video interviews called &#8220;We Are Creators Too&#8221; that focuses on artists who push the boundaries of copyright law. First to be featured was Nina Paley whose Sita Sings the Blues feature film (set to music from the Public Domain) reveals the timelessness of an old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/video" target="_blank">Public Knowledge</a> has just released their new series of four video interviews called &#8220;We Are Creators Too&#8221; that focuses on artists who push the boundaries of copyright law. First to be featured was Nina Paley whose <a href="http://www.sitasingstheblues.com/">Sita Sings the Blues</a> feature film (set to music from the Public Domain) reveals the timelessness of an old Indian folk tale while simultaneously exposing the archaic nature of copyright. Francesca Coppa, fan, academic and <a href="http://fanlore.org/wiki/Main_Page" target="_blank">keeper of women&#8217;s vidding herstory</a> is also featured along with <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oplFXsgUNFU" target="_blank">Jonathan</a> and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK1siWuv_Ak" target="_blank">myself</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/about" target="_blank">Public Knowledge</a> is a great resource for remix artists and vidders because they  acknowledge that Fair Use is a right, not a privilege. As artist, we  can only continue making new work with the hopes that the product and process decreases  copyright confusion and encourages the use of new media technologies to  sustain media literacy and critical thinking about popular, and proprietary, culture.</p>
<p>Part 4 &#8211; Francesca Coppa<br />
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/10/05/we-are-creators-too/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p><br />
Part 3 &#8211; Jonathan McIntosh<br />
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/10/05/we-are-creators-too/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p><br />
Part 2 &#8211; Elisa Kreisinger<br />
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/10/05/we-are-creators-too/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p><br />
Part 1 &#8211; Nina Paley<br />
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/10/05/we-are-creators-too/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/10/05/we-are-creators-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dollhouse &#8211; It Depends on What You Pay</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/07/24/dollhouse-it-depends-on-what-you-pay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/07/24/dollhouse-it-depends-on-what-you-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please note this vid deals with issues of rape and consent. More specifically, it&#8217;s a playful yet critical look at the troubling presentation of these issues in the Fox television show &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221;. Because these topics are intense, we feel viewers should  be aware of the content before viewing. The vid is fittingly titled &#8220;It Depends [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Please note </strong></em>this vid deals with issues of rape and consent. More specifically, it&#8217;s a playful yet critical look at the troubling presentation of these issues in the Fox television show &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221;. Because these topics are intense, we feel viewers should  be aware of the content before viewing.</p>
<p>The vid is fittingly titled &#8220;It Depends on What You Pay&#8221; by vidder <a href="http://giandujakiss.dreamwidth.org/">Gianduja Kiss</a> who expertly combines clips from the first season of Joss Whedon&#8217;s new television show &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221; with music from the 1960&#8242;s off-Broadway musical &#8220;The Fantasticks&#8221;.</p>
<p>For those unfamiliar with the premise of the show, it&#8217;s set inside a secretive corporation called the Dollhouse. People are coerced into handing over their bodies to the Dollhouse which then rents out those bodies for profit. The &#8220;actives&#8221; or &#8220;dolls&#8221; have their minds wiped and are then re-programed with the personalities and skills desired by each new &#8220;client&#8221;.</p>
<p>Gianduja Kiss&#8217;s vid brilliantly exposes the fact that these &#8220;dolls&#8221; have no way to consent to any of their &#8220;engagements&#8221; &#8211; sexual or otherwise &#8211; an issue the show ignores. The vid names this disturbing lack of consent for what it is &#8211; rape. This calling out of the show&#8217;s narrative is an important step in countering the current rape culture and its place in our culture of violence.</p>
<p>Here is the <a href="http://giandujakiss.dreamwidth.org/5398.html">original vid post on dreamwidth</a> where you can get a hi-res version.</p>
<p><code><p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/07/24/dollhouse-it-depends-on-what-you-pay/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></code></p>
<p>For more on these issues and &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221; check out this post on <em>The Angry Black Woman</em> <a href="http://theangryblackwoman.com/2009/04/28/the-problem-with-dollhouse-is-not-that-i-dont-understand-subtlety/">“The problem with Dollhouse is not that I don’t understand subtlety”</a> and this one on <em>Feminist SF</em> <a href="http://blogs.feministsf.net/?p=1138">“Working in the Dollhouse”</a> as well as<span style="color: #0000ff;"><span style="color: #000000;"> </span></span><a href="http://giandujakiss.livejournal.com/tag/dollhouse">Gianduja Kiss&#8217;s insightful posts</a> on the topic.</p>
<p>In closing we would like to echo a recent tweet on the  <a href="http://www.feministfrequency.com/">Feminist Frequency</a> blog about &#8220;Dollhouse&#8221; that links to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYaczoJMRhs">Joss Whedon&#8217;s inspiring 2006 Equality Now speech</a> and reads:</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content"> Dear Joss, you should rewatch this video because I think you may have forgotten your principles, you might learn something from yourself. Love, Anita <a rel="nofollow" href="http://bit.ly/lBvP3" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/lBvP3</a></span></span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/07/24/dollhouse-it-depends-on-what-you-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imeem Removes Fan Vids Along With All UGV</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/07/06/imeem-removes-all-fan-vids-along-with-all-other-ugv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/07/06/imeem-removes-all-fan-vids-along-with-all-other-ugv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fair use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imeem youtube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YouTube&#8217;s January 2009 Massacre hit many vidders using that video sharing site particularly hard because their Content ID system can not decipher between a copyright violation and a fair use of the original material. Last week fannish vidders found themselves caught in the midst of yet another online video massacre. Much of the vidding community [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube&#8217;s <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/02/hey-warner-leave-those-kids-alone" target="_blank">January 2009 Massacre</a> hit many <a href="http://fanlore.org/wiki/Vidding">vidders</a> using that video sharing site particularly hard because their <a href="http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/testing-youtubes-aud" target="_blank">Content ID </a>system can not decipher between a copyright violation and a fair use of the original material. Last week fannish vidders found themselves caught in the midst of yet another online video massacre. Much of the vidding community had been using the media sharing site imeem which, until recently, had been a safe space for them to post fan works and share in fan communities.  But <a href="http://blog.imeem.com/2009/06/25/simplifying-imeem/" target="_blank">imeem recently announced</a> they were &#8216;simplifying&#8217; their website and deleting all use- generated video (UGV), again leaving vidders without a community to upload and share their works. Imeem is now &#8220;de-emphasizing&#8221; UGV because of costs and concerns over their return on investment (ROI). They say &#8220;Simply put, there’s no ROI for us in UGV.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id=":12" dir="ltr">We feel this is an insult to the vidding and other photo/video communities that helped build imeem as a service. We think that to simply jettison user generated creative works in this way due to profit margins is shameful and abhorrent.</span></p>
<p>The end of the vidding community on imeem does not just stop with the loss of the vids but also a deletion of all comments and playlists, loss of the cumulative hit counts and vidding network disruptions. To add insult to injury, imeem continues to prohibit users from downloading their own content. Some of the startling experiences and over-all mistreatment of content producers are documented <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/vidding/1916075.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>What this means for our blog is that many of our favorite vids will be offline until they can be relocated to other sites. Many of our favorites will be on blip.tv since they&#8217;ve implemented a <a href="http://blog.blip.tv/blog/2006/06/22/copyright-and-fair-use-policy/" target="_blank">fair use policy</a>, this despite their recent <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/vidding/1923862.html" target="_blank">vidder-</a><a href="http://community.livejournal.com/vidding/1923862.html" target="_blank">targeted takedowns</a> for posting &#8220;copyrighted material&#8221;. Others will be moving to BAM. A comparison of the two sites&#8217; hosting capacities <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/vidding/1922390.html" target="_blank">is posted here.</a></p>
<p>In caution to vidders transitioning away from imeem, <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/vidding/1915846.html" target="_blank">Morgan Dawn has outlined the copyright policies</a> of various video services. She adds &#8220;how they will handle the transformative nature of fan vids is still anyone&#8217;s guess.&#8221;</p>
<p>Please be patient with us as we try to find the new location of vids we have posted here over the past few months and update our posts accordingly. If you&#8217;ve found a vid&#8217;s new digital home, please let us know!<br />
<a href="http://blog.blip.tv/blog/2006/06/22/copyright-and-fair-use-policy/" target="_blank"> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/07/06/imeem-removes-all-fan-vids-along-with-all-other-ugv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Dance Floor (Too Many Dicks)</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/06/29/star-trek-dance-floor-too-many-dicks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/06/29/star-trek-dance-floor-too-many-dicks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bootleg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fandom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sloane&#8217;s first vid is a visual critique of the &#8220;re-booted&#8221; Star Trek movie selectively edited to the sexist, misogynistic song, &#8220;Too Many Dicks on the Dance Floor&#8221; by Flight of the Concords. While &#8220;Too Many Dicks&#8230;&#8221; was originally about having too many men on the dance floor and not enough women to court, Sloane reclaims [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span><a href="http://sloanesomething.livejournal.com/399172.html" target="_blank">Sloane&#8217;s first vid</a> is a visual critique of the &#8220;re-booted&#8221; <em>Star Trek</em> movie selectively edited to the sexist, misogynistic song, </span><span>&#8220;Too Many Dicks on the Dance Floor&#8221; by <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wl_uQOABxg" target="_blank">Flight of the Concords</a></span><span>. While &#8220;Too Many Dicks&#8230;&#8221; was originally about having too many men on the dance floor and not enough women to court, Sloane reclaims it by editing together multiple images of the largely male <em>Star Trek</em> cast to critique it&#8217;s male dominated storyline.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/06/29/star-trek-dance-floor-too-many-dicks/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;When I saw the Star Trek movie, I was disappointed that J.J. Abrams had dramatically rewritten so many elements of Star Trek canon &#8211; and had largely ignored women. I was surprised how many people didn&#8217;t seem to think that was a problem, or even that the issue existed.&#8221; &#8212; <span><a href="http://sloanesomething.livejournal.com/399172.html" target="_blank">Sloane</a></span></p></blockquote>
<p>Her vid eloquently proves her point: it is hard to ignore the male to female ratio in the new updated <em>Star Trek</em> movie. Uhura has the heavy burden of being the only female character with any significant dialog and, to further the disappointment, is written into &#8220;the girlfriend&#8221; role. The vid is extremely popular in the fan/vidding community,  emphasizing the huge demand to see more women in prominent roles on television and in the movies.</p>
<p>This vid also serves as a strong argument for the importance of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cam_(movie_piracy)">cam recordings</a> used for visual criticism and critique. It is essential that these types of critiques be made in a timely fashion while films are still fresh in the mind collective consciousness of the public. If vidders and political remixers have to wait to make their visual arguments until a film&#8217;s DVD release, than the window for sparking public debate and discussion will often have past.</p>
<p><span>Because a song&#8217;s lyrics are </span><span>often the critical</span><span> lens through which the viewer can read the commentary in a vid, we have pasted them below the fold.<br />
<span id="more-971"></span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Too many dicks on the dance floor<br />
Too many dicks on the dance floor<br />
Too many dicks<br />
Too many dicks on the dance floor<br />
Too many dicks<br />
Too many dicks on the dance floor<br />
Too many dicks</p>
<p>Going to the party<br />
Sippin&#8217; on Bacardi<br />
Wanna meet a hottie<br />
But there&#8217;s Adam, Steve and Marty<br />
There&#8217;s Billy, Todd and Tommy<br />
They&#8217;re on leave from the army<br />
The only boobs I&#8217;ll see tonight will be made of origami</p>
<p>Tell the players, make it understood<br />
It ain&#8217;t no good if there&#8217;s too much wood<br />
Make sure you know before you go<br />
The dance floor bro-hoe ratio<br />
Five to one is a brodeo<br />
Tell Steve and Mike it&#8217;s time to go<br />
Wait outside all night to find<br />
Twenty dudes in a conga line</p>
<p>Too many dicks on the dance floor<br />
Easy to fix<br />
Too many dicks on the dance floor<br />
Spread out the dicks</p>
<p>Too many dudes<br />
With too many dicks<br />
Too close to my shit<br />
Too hard to meet chicks<br />
I need better odds<br />
More broads, less rods<br />
I came to do battle<br />
Scadaddle with the cattle prods</p>
<p>Too many men<br />
Too many boys<br />
Too many misters<br />
Not enough sisters<br />
Too much time on, too many hands<br />
Not enough ladies, too many mans</p>
<p>Too many dicks<br />
Too many dongs<br />
Too many schlongs<br />
Now sing this song</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/06/29/star-trek-dance-floor-too-many-dicks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/05/06/us-vid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/05/06/us-vid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This multifandom vid by British vidder Lim is self-referential to the vidding process and community. The metavid integrates iconic fandoms such as &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; and &#8220;V for Vendetta&#8221;, along with fans, including Henry Jenkins, to the song &#8220;Us&#8221; by Regina Spektor. With tight editing and a depth of references, the vid comments on how vidders [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder1_Mediametadata1_MetadataPieceThreeValue">This <a href="http://fanlore.org/wiki/Multi-fandom">multifandom</a> vid by British vidder Lim is self-referential to the vidding process and community. The <a href="http://fanlore.org/wiki/Metavid" target="_blank">metavid</a> integrates iconic fandoms such as &#8220;Star Trek&#8221; and &#8220;V for Vendetta&#8221;, along with fans, including Henry Jenkins, to the song &#8220;Us&#8221; by Regina Spektor. </span>With tight editing and a depth of references, the vid comments on how vidders interact with texts, fandoms, and media, comparing the compulsory &#8220;under-the-radar&#8221; work of fans and vidders to the insider and exclusive works of academics. The collective power of the vid&#8217;s imagery seems to be a metaphor for  the  history and dynamics of vidding whereby groups of fans collaborate to share technology and access to source materials, taking back ownership of and commenting on popular culture.</p>
<p><a href="http://community.livejournal.com/vidding/989634.html" target="_blank">Get a Hi-Res version</a><code> and see Lim's <a href="http://blim.blip.tv/">blip channel</a>.<br />
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/05/06/us-vid/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></code></p>
<p>Lim&#8217;s not only articulate through her videos but through her comments on the media as well.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The media seems to think they own the things they&#8217;ve pumped into my brain in 27 years. It seems to me ludicrous that television spends so much time and so much money carefully colonizing my mind. But it is my mind.&#8221; <a href="http://blim.blip.tv/"></a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/05/06/us-vid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women&#8217;s Work</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/04/08/womens-work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/04/08/womens-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this vid, Luminosity &#38; Sisabet use footage from the TV horror show “Supernatural” and Hole’s song “Violet” to construct a powerful critique of the victimization and eroticization of violence towards female television characters. It was awarded &#8220;Best Video of 2007&#8243; by NY Magazine. It&#8217;s no surprise, since their collaboration has yielded a meticulously edited [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this vid,  <a href="http://luminosity.blip.tv/" target="_blank">Luminosity &amp; Sisabet</a> use footage from the TV horror show  “Supernatural” and Hole’s song “Violet” to construct a powerful critique of the victimization and  eroticization of violence towards female television characters.  It was awarded <a href="http://nymag.com/movies/features/videos/40622/" target="_blank">&#8220;Best Video of 2007&#8243;</a> by NY Magazine. It&#8217;s no surprise, since their collaboration has yielded a meticulously edited vid critical of one of their most beloved shows.</p>
<p>The show&#8217;s original storyline follows two heroic brothers as they rid the world of paranormal events. Week after week, a “chick of the week” is slain by the brothers or supernatural forces. Luminosity &amp; Sisabet ingeniously remove the two main male characters and focus their storyline on these killed-off  and often nameless female characters in an effort to show how women are violated and eroticized to further the plot, but are rarely part of it. We think this is an important distinction; women&#8217;s mere presence in a story does not equate or signify a meaningful existence for them beyond the roles of monster and victim.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/04/08/womens-work/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>Luminosity and Sisabet decided to construct their vid using content solely from the show &#8220;Supernatural&#8221;, but they could have easily used footage from other series like “CSI”, “Law and Order”, or “Heroes” because the story lines are often similar: the death or suffering of a female character within the first 3 minutes drives the male main characters to set out on their hunt.</p>
<p>In remix, it&#8217;s the visual arrangement of clips and the artist&#8217;s intent that makes the video&#8217;s message either liberating or oppressive. In addition, a basic understanding of the original show being used is often important for the viewer to understand the context. In “Women’s Work”, understanding “Supernatural”, while not being a weekly fan, allowed us to interpret the vid as critical of the depiction of women as eroticized victims, rather than assembled to glorify the violence against women. Knowing Luminosity and Sisabet&#8217;s intention and the basic concept behind their source footage helped us make this distinction. Because the remix, and in this case, vidding, forms can be used to glorify oppressive ideas, it&#8217;s important to understand these aspects.</p>
<p>Luminosity&#8217;s other meticulously crafted vids can be found on <a href="http://luminosity.blip.tv/" target="_blank">blip.tv</a>.</p>
<p>For a more in-depth analysis of this vid,  scroll to the second half of <a href="http://aqueductpress.blogspot.com/2007/08/womens-art-and-womens-work.html" target="_blank">this post</a> on the blog <em>Ambling Along the Aqueduct</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/04/08/womens-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Detachable Penis</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/03/21/detachable-penis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/03/21/detachable-penis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elisa</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This classic vid was created in 1997 by the Media Cannibals collective who combined the song Detachable Penis by the band King Missile with clips from a late 70s British crime drama called The Professionals. Incredibly, the vid was created with tape to tape VCR technology making the precise edits to the lyrics all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This classic vid was created in 1997 by the <a title="Media Cannibals" href="http://www.thecircuitarchive.com/tca/cgi-bin/contact.cgi?author=Media%20Cannibals">Media Cannibals</a> collective who combined the song <em>Detachable Penis</em> by the band <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Missile">King Missile</a> with clips from a late 70s British crime drama called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Professionals_(TV_series)">The Professionals</a>. Incredibly, the vid was created with tape to tape VCR technology making the precise edits to the lyrics all the more impressive.</p>
<p>We wanted to post the vid because we think it offers an insightful look at the media portal of masculinity using guns and other weapons as a hilarious metaphor for the penis. We read it to be critical of the violent and phallocentric concepts of masculinity that are driven by the media.</p>
<p>However, we want to note that this was not exactly the creator’s intention. The <a title="Media Cannibals" href="http://www.thecircuitarchive.com/tca/cgi-bin/contact.cgi?author=Media%20Cannibals">Media Cannibals</a> did intend to make fun of phallocentric media culture but insist they were not trying to be critical of the violence and guns on TV per se.</p>
<p>While we may project our own points of view, critical or not, onto remixes and vids, it&#8217;s often important to understand the original intent for the piece. Because remix and vids are not an necessarily inherently critical form, we viewers can only rely on the visual display of content and the intent of the creators to decide whether or not they are political in nature.</p>
<p>The vid is also available in <a href="http://thecircuitarchive.com/" target="_blank">better quality for DL</a>.</p>
<p><code><p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/03/21/detachable-penis/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/03/21/detachable-penis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kirk is a Womanizer</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/03/07/kirk-is-a-womanizer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/03/07/kirk-is-a-womanizer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[vidding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/?p=696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This vid, by 16 year old ImaginarySanity, casts James T. Kirk from the original 1960s Star Trek series as the subject of Britany Spears&#8217; hit song &#8216;Womanizer&#8217;. It layers appropriated clips of the Starship captain&#8217;s romances-of-the-week combined with a series of colored filters and motion effects to match the video to the beat of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This vid, by 16 year old <a href="http://imaginarysanity.blogspot.com/">ImaginarySanity</a>, casts James T. Kirk from the original 1960s Star Trek series as the subject of  Britany Spears&#8217; hit song &#8216;Womanizer&#8217;. It layers appropriated clips of the Starship captain&#8217;s <span>romances-of-the-week</span><span> combined with</span><span> a series of colored filters and motion effects to match the video to the beat of the audio. </span><span>It is no secret that sexism plagued the first Star Trek</span><span> series and considering Kirk&#8217;s notorious skirt-chasing, </span><span>we think the vid exposes his inner womanizer perfectly.<br />
</span></p>
<p>ImaginarySanity <span>also playfully hints at a mass media double standard: while it&#8217;s acceptable (and often expected) for men to be sexually available and have multiple partners without &#8220;settling down&#8221;, women who engage in similar sexual activity are criticized and often portrayed as &#8220;sluts&#8221;. As the ending credits indicate this vid characterizes Kirk as the &#8220;male slut&#8221; and portrays his Casanova ways in a more critical light.<br />
</span></p>
<p>ImaginarySanity also makes kirk/spock slash vids which you can see them on her Youtube <a href="http://imaginarysanity.blogspot.com/">channel</a> or <a href="http://imaginarysanity.blogspot.com/">blog</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/03/07/kirk-is-a-womanizer/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politicalremixvideo.com/2009/03/07/kirk-is-a-womanizer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
